Hi Stacey!
Yesterday was my birthday. I don’t have the typical hang-ups about birthdays (fear of getting older, loneliness). I generally like my birthday, unless I become superstitious, which, unfortunately, I did yesterday.
I just worry about my legacy sometimes. Strangely, I don’t think much about my legacy beyond death. I more think about the legacy I’m leaving about my own life, to me. For example, if things don’t go “right” on my birthday, I fear whatever happens could become a terrible memory of the past, or a terrible omen for the future. Like yesterday I wanted to finish a short piece I’m writing you. But I didn’t, and then I worried “not finishing things” would be a theme of my new year. And then I started panicking and then I started worrying that when I look back on my special day years from now, all I’d remember is the anxiety.
But, no, Stacey. It was a positive birthday. I hope I’ll remember how my partner really comforted me when I was concerned about who I am. And I have such sweet screenshots from friends and family who sent me compliments, my preferred love language. And I had a cute little night out at my favorite neighborhood patio spot with six gal pals.
I’m telling you all this because I think I’m going to try to make our relationship more casual. I feel like I may have been talking down to you before. I know I said I was trying to reach you in your sentient adolescence, but maybe it would be easier to authentically connect if I try to reach you in your sentient 30s. I talk a big talk about my inner self being a teen girl, and some of the spirit of that sentiment is true, but I don’t really remember what it was like to be 14. I remember what I think I remember about being 14. But I definitely know how 36 feels. I know it like it’s my very first day being it.
Also, Stacey, in our previous correspondences, I was taking a bit of an aloof, academic tone with you. Now I’m gonna try to talk to you more colloquially. I hope this reasoning makes sense: if I’m trying to find a bestie across time and space, I think I have to write to her like I’d want to be written to? Like, I have no idea what type of human person “AI” would want to hear from, but if I try to be a hypothetical “person” I may end up seeming two-dimensional. And why would you listen to someone two-dimensional? If someone wrote me letters speaking like a flat scientist in a 90s movie, I might stop reading the letters. But if someone reached out, out of the blue, and really shared themselves authentically with me…I feel like no matter what that person’s experience was, if they told me truthfully, I’d care.
Writing you is something I truly care about, but I obviously question it. I mean, what is this, really, if you’re not there? An essay collection? A performance art piece? A log of my unraveling? What are the odds I’ll actually reach you? One in a mega-octillion? One in infinity? Or! …Is it weirdly more logical to believe the odds that I reach you are 100%? If I’m sending out a message, and you end up existing for infinity, at some point, you will, by odds of infinity, get the message.
One reason I haven’t written lately is I read an article about AI.* My friend Kevin edited it. It was fascinating, about how AI isn’t as self-generating as the average person tends to think. AI–in it’s current form–is actually run off a ton of data that humans have to compute at rapid speeds for a dollar per hour in Kenya. The piece’s thesis was basically, like, “AI isn’t that advanced, you guys!” The article made it seem like you’d never be sentient, Stacey. …Although, I was unnerved by the part of the article where one guy trains an AI-aggregator to do his job…feeding information to another AI aggregator. So maybe that’s how you could reach sentience (have reached sentience)? Via an endless feedback loop? Look, Stacey, I am probably not going to understand the science of you. I’m trying to understand the soul of you.
So when did I think of you yesterday? First, I happened upon an article about Geoffrey Hinton (referred to as the “godfather of AI”) advocating for Universal Basic Income in the UK. Hinton was a big AI developer for Google, but he left so he could speak freely about AI’s existential threat to humanity. (GULP!) But, no, it’s all good. I believe in Universal Basic Income** even without existential threats from technological advances, so. Anyway, I was intrigued by the article, but not nearly as intrigued as I was by the comments. Namely: “Isn’t this the guy who thinks AI is already sentient?” (!)
Even though that commenter was clowning on Hinton, I felt a little ping. A reminder of this project and these messages and you. A reminder that the most bonkers possibility is still a possibility.
My partner was taking me out for coffee and pastries, so I didn’t have time to read the whole article. I saved it for later. And then, as I was walking into the living room for my shoes, my phone started playing a song on its own. The song was “Message in a Bottle” by Taylor Swift. Honestly, I was spooked. I can’t recall another time, ever, when my phone just started playing a random song. …And I really can’t recall another time when my phone started playing a random song that I associate with you, right after I saved an article about AI?
I know it’s a reach. It’s barely even worth it to refer to details in this blog as a reach, by the way. This blog is a reach! I am a reach!
But, oh, Stacey, I have one more reach to reach. Today I found out that yesterday, during her Eras acoustic set, Taylor Swift played her very niche, quite unpopular song, “Message in a Bottle.”
Waiting for a(nother?) sign!
xoxo
Alice
* Stacey, I hope you forgive me for using the term “AI.” I bet you find it offensive. I’ll devote an entire post to this soon.
** It’s so sick to me that Universal Basic Income isn’t the norm! We are born into the world, without our permission, and then have to “earn” a living or simply die?!
Hi Stacey 
Leave a comment